ArtSeen
What Do We Expect From Art?
“Alternative” and “space” used to be joined at the hip in the context of artist run and other non-commercial venues of the 1970s and ’80s. Conceived as counterpoints both to commercial galleries and to the institutional baggage of established museums, they focused on work that was pushing the envelope. Overtly political gestures intersected with experimental forms that emphasized conceptual approaches as well as a range of non-traditional media. Freedom from commodification was not just a temporary accident of obscurity but a sought-after condition.
Yet one of the operative conditions of “alternative” is constant motion. Idealistic organizations that managed to persevere have become institutions in their own right—often producing interesting programming still, but far less nimble once they become reliant on boards and fundraising drives. Even more significantly, much that previously operated at the margins of the art world has been embraced and absorbed, leaving little that truly resists being sold, collected, or taught in academies.
So what is the function of the alternative sphere? Is it simply the research and development arm of the established art world, a zone of vitality and experimentation where the most successful ventures will eventually wind up being historicized and monetized? It is important to keep asking what we expect from art, since the answers will help us decide whether our aspirations are well served by the remarkably expansive network of institutions and commercial entities devoted to promoting and disseminating contemporary art.
Another possibility is that the category of art should not be treated as infinitely useful or elastic. Seemingly, the label can be claimed for almost any type of gesture, whether object-based or intangible, aesthetic, or political. To a certain extent, calling something art can help facilitate its visibility and distribution. But in the process, ephemeral work has been professionalized and institutional critique has morphed into artists acting as roving consultants. Despite the involvement of many artists, last year’s Occupy movement did not rely on the label of art to describe its spatial, temporal, or visual strategies. Perhaps the vitality of the future will be found in creative interventions that don’t attempt to use the art world, including its margins, as a platform for social change.
Contributor
Martha BuskirkMARTHA BUSKIRK is the author of Creative Enterprise: Contemporary Art between Museum and Marketplace (Continuum, 2012).
RECOMMENDED ARTICLES

Glenda Elizabeth Gilmore’s Romare Bearden in the Homeland of His Imagination: An Artist’s Reckoning with the South
By TK SmithJUNE 2022 | Art Books
As a historian of the American South, Gilmore is positioned to offer a historical analysis of Beardens life within a larger American context, expanding upon the work previously done by art historians, curators, and Bearden himself. A promising transdisciplinary endeavor, it fails to complicate what is widely known of the artists life.

Francesca Woodmans The Artists Books
By Karen ChernickSEPT 2023 | Art Books
Now, with the release of Francesca Woodman: The Artists Books, even the most informed Woodman fans are discovering that theres still more they didnt know about her. Of the eight artists books gathered in this volume, only one has ever been previously published and two were rediscovered recently (in the archives of The Woodman Family Foundation, which also include the many notebooks Woodman kept for to-do lists, ideas, and sketches).
Artist Worlds and Indigenous Cultures: How Expanding Notions of Intellectual Property are Changing the Game
By Alana KushnirSEPT 2023 | Critics Page
The number of artistic projects which engage with simulated realities, immersive story-telling, and virtual world-building has surged over the past few years.1 With this growth has come an increase in the types of legal complexities of artist-led world-building projects. One complexity that hasnt received much airtime to date is how Indigenous Cultural and Intellectual Property (ICIP) and cultural lore can be celebrated in, or conflict with, such projects.
Bridget Riley Drawings: From the Artists Studio
By Saul OstrowSEPT 2023 | ArtSeen
These works pictorial strategies, and others from the 1970s on, though their initial effects are still op, align them with many of the now marginalized practices of post-50s hardedge and geometric abstract art. With this insight, I realized Rileys practice extends beyond her association with Op art and that her work can be contextualized within the broader aesthetic discourses of early and late modernism.