ArtSeen
Disseminating Photography
Picture a history of photography freed from the tyranny of the photograph. No longer confined to static objects or specific technologies, this history would instead engage the photographic image in all its various manifestations, wherever and in whatever form they have appeared. As a consequence, dissemination, rather than production, would become our study’s guiding logic. In taking this expanded view of its territory, the history of photography would at last fall into sync with its own story. The earliest sustained photographic experiments were motivated by a desire to develop a mode of automated reproduction, and this continued to preoccupy photography’s pioneers. Several people attempted to turn the otherwise unique daguerreotype plate into an engraved matrix capable of generating ink-on-paper prints. This effort found fulfillment in the efforts of English inventor William Henry Fox Talbot, who spent the last 25 years of his life developing a photographic engraving system in which a metal plate could be imprinted with a photographic image—the system that came to dominate 20th-century publishing. But even before this became possible, early commercial photographers frequently had their work published as wood or steel engravings or as lithographs, allowing that work to appear in multiple copies in the illustrated press and to be seen all over the world. For this to occur, the photographic image had to be divorced from the photograph itself, a conceptual displacement of form from substance. This displacement is of course now central to our everyday experience of photography; indeed, it is what photography is.
A shift in focus from the photograph to its dissemination would have any number of effects on how we understand the practice of photography. In the short term, it would do away with a lingering art historical bias that privileges origins and originality, innovation and invention, over ordinary and vernacular practices. More importantly, it would acknowledge that the same image has the capacity to come in many different looks, sizes and formats, and, even stranger, can appear in many places at once and exist simultaneously at many different points of time. Equally complicated is the way its capacity for reproducibility ties photography to the processes and social implications of capitalism, making any examination of its effects an unavoidably political issue. But perhaps the most significant consequence of this new history would be its necessarily critical engagement with the identity of its subject. Dissemination both divides and multiplies, complicating our grasp of photography but also of identity of any sort—including our own.
Contributor
Geoffrey BatchenGEOFFREY BATCHEN, a former resident of Brooklyn, teaches the history of photography at Victoria University of Wellington in New Zealand. His most recent book is a co-edited volume titled Picturing Atrocity: Photography in Crisis.
RECOMMENDED ARTICLES

Companion Pieces: New Photography 2020
By Graham W. BellNOV 2020 | ArtSeen
The latest iteration of MoMAs New Photography exhibition cycle comprises works from eight artists and takes place entirely online. Companion Pieces asks the viewer to look beyond initial reactions and delve deeper into our reading of images.

Masculinities: Liberation Through Photography
By Daniel PatemanMAY 2020 | ArtSeen
Barbican curator Alona Pardo has united more than 50 artists of different gender identities, sexualities, ethnicities, and cultural backgrounds, whose divergent approachesspread across six themed sectionschallenge a singular, prescribed definition of masculinity. Rigorously exploring how it has been imagined, socially constructed, and performed from the 1960s to today, this timely show is an ambitious testament to the breadth of male experience.

Urban Impulses: Latin American Photography From 1959 to 2016
By Daniel PatemanOCT 2019 | ArtSeen
Gray reality with a streak of pink exuberance, themes of protest and popular culture, monochrome photography and full color: Urban Impulses sets up these structural dichotomies and largely manages to reconcile them.
James Luna: Take a Picture with a Real Indian
By Susan HarrisDEC 20-JAN 21 | ArtSeen
James Luna:e a Picture with a Real Indian is a posthumous installation at Garth Greenan Gallery of a performance/installation originally commissioned by the Whitney Museums downtown branch in 1991. The piece takes on issues of Native American identity and stereotypes, and explores how they land in largely non-Native spaces of viewing and writing about art.