Editor's Message From The Editor
Men of La Mancha
For most of us who grew up in the 20th century, two things seemed certain never to happen in our lifetime: a black person getting elected president of the U.S., or the Cubs winning the World Series. At the outset of July, I am now absolutely convinced that at least one of these campaigns will succeed this coming fall. Sad to say, only one of the two quixotic efforts excites me at the moment.
I’m not sure what to make of the formerly inspiring presidential candidate known as Barack Obama. That he has been so eager to dash past the center towards the right on a variety of issues suggests that his presidency would be business as usual—the Democratic base taken for granted, military spending unchecked, corporations unregulated. Obama’s spineless stance on telecom immunity has rightly earned him the ire of the party’s netroots. There is no natural constituency to call him out for his utterly absurd criticisms of the Supreme Court’s recent ruling against capital punishment for child rapists. Yet Obama, a legislator in Illinois when that state’s death penalty process was exposed as hopelessly biased by race and class, has now endorsed the expansion of capital punishment to include non-murderers—a favorite weapon of the Jim Crow South.
By using the law-and-order card to score cheap political points, Obama has deployed the same tactics the Republicans have relied on since the 1960s. In doling out centrist mush, he’s following the playbook of the 2000 Al Gore and the 2004 John Kerry. His economic agenda is far closer to Wall Street than Main Street. Like Kerry, Obama is betting that popular distaste for Bush’s pathetic legacy will be enough to propel him into office. In truth, the Dems are doing McCain and the Republicans a favor. As less and less separates the two candidates in terms of issues, the election becomes a referendum on personalities. And the Republicans have been pretty skillful in turning harmless characters—from Mondale and Dukakis through Gore to Kerry—into menacing threats to the heartland. The candidate’s race, moreover, was not a factor in those smear efforts.
As for where his campaign goes from here, that’s up to Obama. Personally, I’m far more inspired by what’s happening on the North Side of Chicago…In any event, enjoy the summer!
—T. Hamm
RECOMMENDED ARTICLES
“I Could Understand a Person, If That Person Was a…”
By Kyle TurnerOCT 2020 | Theater
How queer is Sondheim’s Company? The answer lies not in the interpretation of Bobby’s sexuality, but instead in Bobby’s unique outlook on marriage and coupledom. As Kyle Turner writes, the famed musical “queers a lineage of storytelling and socialization that presumes such statuses are end goals of satisfaction.”
Ray Johnson and William S. Wilson: Frog Pond Splash
By Mark BlochDEC 20-JAN 21 | Art Books
This beautiful and well-researched book joins a selection of the artist’s collages with texts by his friend, the late critic William S. Wilson. But the star of this show is Johnson, whose magnificent, uncanny, and sublime collages require little explanation that he himself did not provide in abundance during his self-truncated lifetime.
Meena Ysanne
APRIL 2020 | In Memoriam
Changing, and choosing—two things I learned from Genesis, who guided me more than any other person I’ve known, whether near or far. Still does, because, I will all ways be able to draw on the place in my heart that s/he touched.
RosTA
By Olivia GilmoreDEC 20-JAN 21 | ArtSeen
Attending the vernissage for RosTA in person both shocked and soothed, the show resembling a highly consumable piece of mass media, read hesitantly after we removed our masks in the early autumn sun. Hard and steely like the Soviet hammer and sickle, RosTA served danger, sex, agitprop; the denouement, gratis galette, and Nero d’Avola.
